Rapidly progressive vision loss due to fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a diagnostic and management dilemma

  1. Jagadeesh Sutraye ,
  2. Mohan Kannam ,
  3. Rajat Kapoor and
  4. Virender Sachdeva
  1. Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus and Neruo-Ophthalmology, Child Sight Institute, Nimmagadda Prasad Children's Eye Care Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, GMRV Campus, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Virender Sachdeva; drvsachdeva29@gmail.com; vsachdeva@lvpei.org

Publication history

Accepted:16 Sep 2020
First published:04 Nov 2020
Online issue publication:04 Nov 2020

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

A 44-year-old obese woman presented with decrease in vision in the right eye (RE) for 3 days. She reported a simultaneous onset of holocranial headache that worsened on bending forward. She denied eye pain, pain on eye movements, and other ocular or neurological complaints. On examination, her distance best-corrected visual acuity was counting fingers at 1 m in the RE and 20/20 in the left eye (LE). Colour vision was subnormal in both eyes (BE). There was grade II relative afferent pupillary defect in the RE. Fundus examination showed disc oedema in BE . Visual fields in the LE showed central scotoma extending nasally. A provisional diagnosis of papillitis was considered. However, contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain and orbits showed evidence of elevated intracranial pressure. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure was 42 cm H2O while rest of the CSF analysis was normal. Diagnosis was revised to fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Management with medical therapy and urgent thecoperiteoneal shunt improved visual function in BE.

Background

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a syndrome characterised by symptoms of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) such as headache, transient visual obscurations, tinnitus and diplopia in the absence of any intracranial structural lesions such as intracranial tumour, hydrocephalus, intracranial infections, meningitis and cerebral abscesses.1 2 It commonly affects middle-aged obese women of childbearing age, has an insidious or subacute presentation and vision is preserved until late in the course.3 4 Uncommonly, patients with IIH might have a rapidly worsening course such as acute deterioration of visual function, and other signs of elevated ICP might be less marked. This uncommon form is known as ‘fulminant or malignant IIH’; and if not timely diagnosed or managed, it can lead to permanent loss of vision.5 6 Urgent medical management with high doses of oral acetazolamide followed by early optic nerve sheath fenestration and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures is necessary in preserving visual function in these patients. Furthermore, rapid worsening of visual function might be confused with other pathologies such as optic neuritis, ischaemic optic neuropathy and malignant hypertension. This report highlights a similar case that caused initial diagnostic challenge, but correct interpretation of neuroimaging findings and timely interventions led to preservation of the visual function.

Case presentation

A 44-year-old obese woman presented to our clinic with sudden-onset diminution of vision in her right eye (RE) for 3 days. Vision loss was profound and was associated with diffuse (holocranial) headache that aggravated on bending forward. There was no eye pain or pain on eye movements, photophobia, redness, vomiting, double vision or ptosis. Ocular examination showed a distance best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of counting fingers at 1 m in the RE and 20/20 in the left eye (LE). She could only identify demonstration plate in the RE and 5/17 correct plates by Ishihara colour vision testing in the LE. There was grade II relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) in the RE, and ocular motility was full in both eyes (BE). Rest of the anterior segment examination was normal in BE.

Fundus examination showed medium-sized optic disc with blurred margins in BE (RE worse than LE), obscuration of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), dilated tortuous veins over the disc and few circumferential folds around the right disc (figure 1A). Formal visual field testing was not possible in the RE, and automated perimetry performed using 24-2 Swedish Interactive Testing Algorithm-Fast strategy in the LE showed central scotoma extending nasally into it (figure 1B). Her blood pressure was 130/80 mm Hg. Her height was 146 cm and her weight was 79 kg, giving a body mass index (BMI) of 37 kg/m2 .

Figure 1

(A) Fundus photographs of both eyes show 360° disc oedema with blurring of peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer in both eyes (yellow doted arc), a few flame-shaped haemorrhages in the right eye along the inferotemporal vessels (white arrow) and a few soft exudates along the superonasal vessel in the right eye (orange asterisk). (B) Humphrey visual fields in the left eye show central scotoma extending nasally (black circle). Formal perimetry was not possible in the right eye (marked black).

Given rapid presentation with marked decrease in vision in the RE and subnormal visual fields in the LE, we considered a primary differential diagnosis of papillitis versus rapidly worsening papilloedema in BE. She was advised to undergo MRI of the brain and orbits with contrast and MR venography (MRV) of the brain, if indicated.

The patient returned to clinic with reports 3 days later when she reported worsening of vision in her LE as well. Her examination showed BCVA of no light perception in the RE and 20/600 in the LE. Anterior segment examination was stable; however, there was no RAPD at this visit, with pupillary reactions being sluggish in BE. Fundus examination revealed worsening of disc oedema in BE (figure 2B). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed using the peripapillary RNFL showed diffuse RNFL thickening with an average thickness of 209 and 113 µm in the RE and LE, respectively. Macular ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (MGC-IPL) analysis showed an average thickness of 79 µm in BE at presentation.

Figure 2

(A–C) Composite fundus photographs of the patient at presentation, 3 days and 7 days later showing rapid worsening of the disc oedema in both eyes.Note the obscuaration of the peripapillary RNFL (yellow arc), obscruation of the blood vessles at disc margin (orange arrow-heads), and tiny splinter hemorrhage in right eye (white arrow)

Differential diagnosis

Given her acute vision loss and rapid deterioration of vision, we initially considered a differential diagnosis of bilateral optic neuritis (papillitis), malignant hypertension, nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAAION) and papilloedema with rapidly progressive vision loss due to space-occupying lesion, cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT), or fulminant IIH.

Given her gender, age (20–50 years), and rapid decline in BCVA involving BE, we considered bilateral optic neuritis. However, a diagnosis of typical optic neuritis could not be made because there was bilateral disc swelling and bilateral vision loss, and an absence of pain. In a young woman with progressive vision loss over a few days, inflammation could not be ruled out.

Although papilloedema usually presents with an insidious vision loss, patients with posterior fossa tumours, hydrocephalus, pituitary apoplexy and fulminant IIH may present with a rapid decline in BCVA; therefore, immediate imaging was warranted to exclude a life-threatening cause such as apoplexy or malignancy.7

Bilateral NAAION, though uncommon, is also possible. 8,9 However, it was unlikely given her young age, associated headache and the absence of vasculopathic risk factors.

Another differential diagnosis was malignant hypertension but was quickly ruled out (normal blood pressure recording and no prior history of hypertension).

Investigations

MRI of the brain with contrast revealed scleral flattening and increased perioptic spaces in BE. MRV of the brain showed only bilateral transverse sinus stenosis consistent with elevated ICP but no thrombosis (figure 3A–C), ruling out CSVT (figure 3C). Unlike long-standing cases of IIH, empty sella sign was not observed (figure 3B). Furthermore, CSF opening pressure and analysis was advised. The CSF opening pressure was 42 cm H2O while the rest of the CSF analysis was normal.

Figure 3

(A–C) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain with MR venography (MRV) of the brain of the patient showing flattening of the posterior sclera (white arrow) and increased perioptic nerve sheath (yellow asterisk, A) and bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (yellow arrows, C) but no thrombosis. Note the absence of empty sella, suggesting possible lack of chronicity (B, yellow arrowhead).

A normal MRI and raised CSF pressure with normal CSF is characteristic of pseudotumour cerebri. This can be caused by medications and endocrine disorders, but without a history of these and in the presence of obesity, a narrower diagnosis of IIH was made. In her case, it was fulminant IIH as the vision loss was rapid and severe.

As optic neuritis was thought to be less likely after the lumbar puncture, further investigations for causes of optic neuritis such as myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody–associated optic neuritis or neuromyelitis optica (NMO) were not pursued.

Treatment

The patient was advised to undergo urgent CSF diversion procedure (thecoperiteoneal shunt (TP shunt)). However, she had difficulty arranging finances for urgent surgery, and while awaiting surgery, she was put on maximal medical therapy. She was started on increasing doses of acetazolamide at 250 mg six times per day and increasing up to 3 g/day and administered intravenous injection of methylprednisolone 1 g/day for 3 days while awaiting surgery. Of note, while awaiting surgery, her papilloedema worsened further in BE (figure 2C).

Outcomes and follow-up

The patient was kept in close follow-up, and following TP shunt she reported improvement in her vision and disc oedema. Following TP shunt, she also had relief in her headache and gradually her BCVA improved. At 12 weeks of follow-up, her examination revealed a BCVA of 20/30 in BE, normal colour vision (17/17 correct Ishihara plates), no RAPD and full ocular motility. Fundus examination revealed complete resolution of disc oedema with mild temporal pallor in BE (figure 4A). Automated perimetry showed interval improvement. While at presentation perimetry was not even possible in the RE and showed central scotoma extending nasally in the LE, at 12 weeks of follow-up she had small central scotomas in BE (black arrows) and slight enlargement of blind spot in the LE appreciated on grey scale (dotted circle). At 3 months follow-up, OCT showed RNFL thinning in BE with an average thickness of 65 µm in the RE and 69 µm in the LE. Similarly, MGC-IPL analysis showed diffuse thinning with an average thickness of 50 µm in BE.

Figure 4

(A) Fundus photographs of both eyes show resolution of disc oedema in both eyes with temporal pallor (white arrows). (B) Humphrey visual fields in both eyes show central scotoma in both eyes (black arrows) and slight enlargement of blind spot in the left eye appreciated on grey scale (dotted circle).

Discussion

Our report emphasises the diagnostic and management challenges we faced in this patient. Furthermore, it highlights the severity and rapid deterioration of vision in this patient with fulminant IIH.

As discussed in the section on differential diagnosis, in majority of these patients, first differential diagnosis will be an acute optic neuropathy, especially optic neuritis. However, papilloedema with acute vision loss could not have been ruled out. Surprisingly, neuroimaging showed only features of elevated ICP and no signs of demyelination/inflammation. CSF opening pressure and analysis established the diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of keeping fulminant IIH in the differential diagnosis in such cases, although it is rare.

In the majority of patients with IIH, visual function (central visual acuity and visual fields) remains good initially and insidious vision loss occurs in a setting of chronic disc oedema.3 4 Rarely, these patients may have acute deterioration of vision, and are referred to as fulminant/malignant hypertension.5,6

There is scant prior literature about fulminant/malignant IIH. Most series describe acute vision loss as the presenting feature of fulminant IIH.5,6,10-14 In the largest series by Thambisetty et al,5 they reported cases from two neuro-ophthalmology centres in the USA. They defined fulminant IIH as constellation of acute onset of symptoms of elevated ICP, rapid worsening of vision loss within 4 weeks from onset of symptoms and rapid worsening of vision over few days.5 Diagnosis of fulminant IIH was established in 2.8% (16/572) of all cases with IIH seen at the two neuro-ophthalmology centres at Emory University and Vanderbilt University during the study period. The clinical profile of patients with fulminant course was similar to those with more insidious classical course. The most common symptoms were headaches and vision loss, including blurring of central vision. However, neuroimaging showed lack of empty sella sign. Our patient had similar features and neuroimaging findings.

Normally, autoregulation mechanisms preserve the perfusion in these patients despite papilloedema, but possibly in these patients acute rises in ICP occurs to the extent that the ocular perfusion pressure at the optic disc is compromised before vascular regulation can cope and adjust. Our patient also had similar presentation. She was a middle-aged obese woman with holocranial headache and acute loss of vision in the RE. There was bilateral disc oedema and sequential rapid decrease in vision in BE. There was no history of prior systemic diseases. Even though we initially suspected acute optic neuropathy, neuroimaging showed only signs of elevated ICP. The CSF analysis established diagnosis of IIH, and given considerations of dramatic vision change, we established diagnosis of fulminant IIH.

Prior reports suggest aggressive medical and surgical intervention is essential in this vision-threatening disease. In the series by Thambisetty et al, they used aggressive management with high doses of acetazolamide and repeat lumbar punctures followed by CSF diversion procedures and/or optic nerve sheath fenestration.5 Also, they reported better outcomes in patients who had early surgery compared with those in whom surgery was delayed.

Similarly, Micieli et al recently described a case of fulminant IIH who presented with new-onset headache for 6 weeks, a rapid deterioration of vision in the RE for 3 days and bilateral papilloedema.6 Visual fields showed enlargement of blind spot and nasal depression. The patient had a history of recent weight gain. Neuroimaging showed bilateral transverse sinus stenosis, and the CSF opening pressure was 60 cm H20 with normal CSF constituents. The patient was managed by urgent VP shunt with return of visual function to normal. In another report, Aloni and Arow reported good improvement in visual function in another patient with fulminant IIH after optic nerve sheath fenestration.14 These reports suggest early diagnosis and intervention might lead to good recovery of vision.

Our patient was managed with high doses of acetazolamide and was recommended CSF diversion procedure at the earliest. Despite explaining the urgency of the condition and risk of permanent vision loss, she had difficulty in arranging finances for neurosurgery and rather sought outpatient treatment at another facility. Although lumbar drain could have been performed while awaiting surgery, it was not offered by the treating neurosurgeon. Therefore, in the interim, she was treated with high-dose intravenous injection of methylprednisolone as mentioned in prior literature by Thambisetty et al 5 and Liu et al.15 In this indication, high-dose steroids might help by reducing inflammation and vascular permeability and preserving axonal function while awaiting surgery. This was followed by definite intervention with TP shunt at the earliest. She had immediate relief of her headache and had good recovery of vision at 12 weeks of follow-up.

This report highlights the role of recognising fulminant IIH in patients presenting with acute vision loss and bilateral disc oedema. However, many of these patients might be initially misdiagnosed with acute optic neuropathy such as optic neuritis, NAAION, infiltrative optic neuritis due to rapid and profound vision loss and not papilloedema due to elevated ICP. Possible clues that might point towards fulminant IIH rather than optic neuropathy include headache but lack of eye pain or pain on eye movements, massive disc oedema rather than usual mild-moderate disc oedema in papillitis, associated haemorrhages and soft exudates in the peripapillary retina. However, neuroimaging is essential to establish the diagnosis in these patients. Early intervention might preserve vision in these patients.

Learning points

  • Although idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) usually has an insidious course, it can present with an acute course and rapid loss of vision.

  • This may pose a diagnostic challenge and mimic optic neuritis or ischaemia.

  • Bilateral vision loss and optic disc swelling require immediate neuroimaging.

  • Rapid treatment can prevent permanent and profound vision loss in fulminant IIH.

Acknowledgments

We thank the diagnostic and photographic teams of LV Prasad Eye Institute, GMRV Campus, for their support in patient management and documentation of the clinical pictures and investigations.

Footnotes

  • Contributors VS helped with conceptualisation, data curation, supervision, writing the review and editing. JS and MK helped with data curation and writing the primary draft. RK helped with supervision, writing the review, editing and supporting. In short, VS helped with concept and design; VS, JS and MK with manuscript preparation and collection of data; and VS, JS, MK and RK with the critical revision of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer